Paul Froese, Ph.D. profile photo

Paul Froese, Ph.D.

Professor, Sociology

Waco, TX, UNITED STATES

Dr. Froese focuses on the sociology of meaning, religion, comparative historical sociology, political sociology and ideology.

Media

Publications

Image for publication on On Purpose: How We Create the Meaning of LifeImage for publication on America's Four Gods: What We Say about God--and What That Says about Us

Documents

Photos

photos

Audio/Podcasts

Video

Image for vimeo videos on Robert Wright & Paul Froese [The Wright Show] (full conversation)Image for vimeo videos on Baylor ISR: Symposium on World Christianity (October 11, 2010)

Biography

Dr. Paul Froese is a professor of sociology and a research fellow for the Institute for Studies of Religion. He has been teaching and researching at Baylor since 2002. A prolific author of books and articles, his research interests include the sociology of meaning, religion, comparative historical sociology, political sociology and ideology.

Industry Expertise

  • Education/Learning

Areas of Expertise

SociologyReligionReligion Politics & CultureSociety's Images of GodRussians and Religious IdeologySocial Sciences and Study of ReligionPublic OpinionPollingElectionsPublic Policy

Education

University of Washington

Ph.D., Sociology

2003

University of Washington

M.A., Sociology

1999

University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee

M.A., Philosophy

1992

Grinnell College

B.A., Russian

1990

Media Appearances

Can View of God Affect Desire for Economic Justice?

Juicy Ecumenism  online

2022-01-21

Paul Froese, Ph.D., professor of sociology, is quoted in this article analyzing his recent interview with the Poverty, God, Politics webcast hosted by David Beckmann. Froese spoke about the intersection between attitudes and actions addressing care for those in need and religiosity.

view more

3 ways that regular church attendance is good for your health

The Dallas Morning News  online

2021-11-30

This article cites a 2019 study by a research team including Paul Froese, Ph.D., professor of sociology, which found that people who went to church regularly slept longer, fell asleep more easily and awoke feeling more rested in the morning.

view more

Baylor survey finds line blurring between politics, religion

Waco Tribune-Herald  online

2021-06-19

Sociology professor Paul Froese, Ph.D., director of the Baylor Religion Surveys, was interviewed about the latest survey conducted in the volatile months of early 2021, which found the lines between political and religious identity blurring even more as Americans increasingly self-identify in groups.

view more

Atheists outpace evangelicals in knowledge of faith

Baptist News Global  online

2019-10-18

Sociology professor Paul Froese, Ph.D., director of the Baylor Religion Surveys, is quoted in this article about a recent Pew Research Center survey that asked Americans multiple-choice questions about their knowledge of religion. (Terry Goodrich with Baylor Media & Public Relations arranged this faculty expert interview.)

view more

Meet Baylor’s nationally recognized expert on politics, faith and culture

Baylor Proud  online

2019-10-15

Baylor sociologist Paul Froese, Ph.D., is director of the Baylor Religion Surveys, one of the nation’s most influential and comprehensive indicators of the ways Americans live out their faith. Froese has often served as a spokesperson for national media outlets to explain the survey’s findings and what they mean for Americans.

view more

A horn-wearing ‘shaman.’ A cowboy evangelist. For some, the Capitol attack was a kind of Christian revolt.

The Washington Post  online

2021-07-06

Paul Froese, Ph.D., professor of sociology at Baylor and director of the Baylor Religion Surveys, is quoted in this article about the Jan. 6 insurrection and institutional religion becoming more individualized and more disconnected from denominations, theological credentials and oversight.

view more

Articles

Associations among religiousness, social attitudes, and prejudice in a national random sample of American adults

Psychology of Religion and Spirituality

2009

Psychologists have devoted considerable theoretical and empirical attention to the scientific study of social attitudes and prejudice. Most of these studies were conducted with relatively small, nonrepresentative samples of college students. In this study, the authors analyzed self-report data from a random probability sample with over 1500 American adults. Participants answered questions about their religiousness, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), political ideology, demographic characteristics, and attitudes toward persons in historically disadvantaged social groups (i.e., ethnic minorities and homosexual individuals)...

view more

UNRAVELING RELIGIOUS WORLDVIEWS: The Relationship between Images of God and Political Ideology in a Cross-Cultural Analysis

The Sociological Quarterly

2008

Not only do few studies address the issue of how religious belief relates to political ideology, but little attempt has also been made to analyze this relationship from a comparative perspective. Using data from the International Social Survey Program, we examine how images of God, as measured by God's perceived level of engagement and authority, relate to political ideology in seven Western industrial and postindustrial societies. We find that variation in images of God has no effect on whether individuals are politically liberal or conservative in five of seven countries. Nonetheless, beliefs about God are strongly related to abortion and sexual morality attitudes in every country, but only sporadically related to ideas about social and economic justice. In the end, we argue that theological beliefs tend to be unrelated to a general measure of political ideology, not because religious beliefs are politically unimportant in these societies, but rather because religious perspectives are rarely fully liberal or conservative in their political orientation. In addition, we find that Americans hold unique views of God in comparison to other countries in our sample and that the American tendency to view God as more active and authoritative affects policy attitudes in ways contrary to the effects of church attendance.

view more

American Piety 2005: Content and Methods of the Baylor Religion Survey

Journal For the Scientific Study of Religion

2007

The Baylor Religion Survey (BRS) is a national population survey of religious characteristics, orientations, and attitudes modeled after the General Social Survey. This article provides an overview of the content of the 2005 BRS along with a detailed description of our methods of data collection and some descriptive characteristics from our sample of 1,721 adults in the United States. A third of the survey is dedicated solely to religion items focusing on affiliation, identity, belief, experience, and commitment...

view more

God in America: Why Theology Is Not Simply the Concern of Philosophers

Journal For the Scientific Study of Religion

2007

As citizens of the most technologically advanced and economically developed country in the world, nearly all Americans stalwartly maintain their faith in God, much more so than residents of other postindustrial countries (Norris and Ingelhart 2004). But what is the content and meaning of this belief? Perhaps belief in God has become so pervasive in contemporary American culture that it reflects little about believers' deeper religious thoughts, identities, and actions. We find the opposite to be true. Outside the confines of seminaries, competing beliefs about who God is and what God wants have a clear and important connection to everyday religious life in the United States...

view more

Replete and Desolate Markets: Poland, East Germany, and the New Religious Paradigm

Social Forces

2001

Is the new paradigm in the sociology of religion, known commonly as the "supply-side" or "rational choice" perspective, leading towards a plausible general theory? At this point, the answer remains dependent upon how one interprets current deviations from the paradigm's predictions. This article investigates two cases in postcommunist Europe, Poland and East Germany, which appear to contradict a simple core hypothesis of the new paradigm. We argue that these anomalous cases are opportunities to examine and potentially extend the explanatory range of the new paradigm. Ultimately, we conclude that these cases can be shown through closer analysis to fit with the underlying logic of the new paradigm and thereby argue for the theory's continued evaluation and augmentation.

view more

powered byPowered By